fwk 4.1

Hi list,

fwk 4.1+FP1+41LCF23

I'm having a problem with winstlcf installing from a Windows 2000 TMR to either 
an NT4 machine or a WinXP machine.  Both machines have previously been 
endpoints in their respective TMR's (both TMRs are built the same & are w2k at 
the above patch level), but have had the uninstaller ran on them, files deleted 
and registry cleaned & rebooted.  

I run this;

perl %BINDIR%\bin\winstlcf -d "c:/program files/tivoli/lcf-uk" -g 
<mytmr>+<mygwport> -L "lcs.login_interfaces=<mytmr>+<mygwport>/tcp 
bcast_disable=1 address_notif_interval=21600 
lcfd_alternate_port=<myaltepport>" -l <myepport> -D  -N <mytmr> -a -v -Y "host1 
domain\account password"

I get this in response;

"<list of files>

Error creaing lcfd service. See lcfd.log
->
Debug Log:

LCF Installed failed for the following macghines: (see lcfhost.err)
host1"

I've checked the archives, docs & remaining brain cells & tried the following;
- The files have arrived in the specified directory on the endpoint
Oddly, there isn't a c:\[winnt|windows]\Tivoli directory created on the 
endpoint.

- There is no last.cfg created

- The service has been created in the machine registry & "looks" ok.  If I run 
winstlcf again it errors due to the files already being on disk - good this 
means it can see the c$ share.  If I delete the files & re-run winstlcf then it 
creates a new service lcfd-1 which is what I'd expect & seems to show it can 
access the machine registry.

- A reboot doesn't help as then the lcfd service attempts to start & hangs.  At 
one point the NT4 machine was complaining it couldn't find libguid60.dll but 
that file isn't in the list displayed to be sent by winstlcf nor is it present 
on the TMRs (it's now stopped generating that error for some reason!)

- I've checked that the machines have the C$ default share in place.

- I've checked the perl version is v 4

- There are no firewalls between the machines

- I've run wchkdb -ux, wep sync_gateways

- Irritatingly I've used this many times before at fwk 4.1 (but lower patch 
levels) & it's worked fine.



Anyone got any ideas about what to look for next??

Thanks in advance

K