Re: Template Nodes considered harmful

On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Digant C Kasundra wrote:

> Second, is the default node still valid and working?  I didn't  
> capture this
> in my Best Practice but we do have a node default that was  
> inheriting from
> node basenode, so I'm thinking it should now include class  
> baseclass.  How
> is the default node handled with external node definitions?

The default node definitely still exists and is functional.

  --
  The world is round; it has no point.
          -- Adrienne E. Gusoff
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com