|
Re: Looking at WBEM again: msg#00001sysutils.cfg.devel
Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 19:26 schrieb Jason Long: > I just wanted to comment on what I've been up to lately... > > Currently I'm revisiting the idea of using WBEM, [...] using > WBEM would require a radically different middle layer and front-end than > the current Config4GNU project has. Hmmm, good to know someone is at least thinking of CFG. I aked a few questions trying to contribute some meta config definitions some time ago and saw some more questions with no response. That said, it feels like you want to scrap CFG for version 2 before becoming a little more testable and releasable. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Looking at WBEM again: 00001, Jason Long |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Looking at WBEM again: 00001, Jason Long |
| Previous by Thread: | Looking at WBEM againi: 00001, Jason Long |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Looking at WBEM again: 00001, Jason Long |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |