|
Re: Faster compression: msg#00198sysutils.backup.backuppc.general
From: "Michael 'Moose' Dinn" <dinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Would people be interested in trying to get them to produce a PCI version? Surely for the price of the card you could buy a bigger harddrive and then not use compression at all? Or I suspect a faster processer would be pretty competive as well. I really don't think that compression is a bottleneck for BackupPC. And it would be really hard for a dedicated piece of hardware to be price competetive with commodity processors. -Wayne ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Restore problem - 2.1.0: 00198, Craig Barratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tape backup aborted by signal=ALRM: 00198, Craig Barratt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Faster compressioni: 00198, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Faster compression: 00198, Craig Barratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |