|
|
April 30, 2003
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Roger Leigh
- Re: confirm 424f5c40ace0ae5e5f07352cb9445365aac0a6de, Mariusz Pekala
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Eric Siegerman
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Eric Siegerman
- Re: different name for debug and release library/program, Guido Draheim
- replacement function library for autoconf checks, Mr E_T
- creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Bob Rossi
- autoconf automake and aclocal, Lol Durst
- different name for debug and release library/program, Juraj Hercek
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Bob Proulx
- I can't set up Makefile.am for data directory & avoid "No rule to make target `all'."..., cs
- INSTALL_DATA and modes, Harlan Stenn
April 29, 2003
- Re: libraries within libraries, Steve M. Robbins
- libraries within libraries, Marco Correia
- Re: libraries within libraries, Bob Rossi
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Roger Leigh
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs
- Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, cs
- Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADDinstead of LDADD?, Steve M. Robbins
- Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, Dale E Martin
- Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, William S Fulton
- Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Bob Proulx
- Re: Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, Bob Proulx
- missing: a patch, Bruce Korb
- Why configure script says to link this library with LIBADD instead of LDADD?, cs
April 25, 2003
- Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Al
- Re: automake and libtool error, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: LEX/YACC definitions header, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Akim Demaille
- libtool-1.5 causes malfunctioning of 'aclocal', Bruno Haible
- creating generic am files to be auto included by automake, Mr E_T
- merging headers, Marco Correia
- Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Harlan Stenn
- Re: tarball checksum/signature targets?, Dr. David Kirkby
April 22, 2003
- Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Karl Berry
- Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Bob Rossi
- Re: CVS version is not less verbose, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Makefile.am for m4, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Can I put a message after tests are run?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Speeding up config and make, Bruce Korb
- Re: is LDADD line the place to put .a convenience libraries AS WELL AS -l switches?? like -lm??? how works?, Dale E Martin
- Re: Speeding up config and make, Robert Boehne
- Re: Speeding up config and make, Bob Proulx
- Any difference between LDADD = ... and myprogram_LDADD = ... ???, cs
- is LDADD line the place to put .a convenience libraries AS WELL AS -l switches?? like -lm??? how works?, cs
April 21, 2003
- Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, cs
- Re: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, Guido Draheim
- Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?, cs
- Speeding up config and make, Bruce Korb
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- 5-Year Anniversary Invitation - RSVP!!!, Success Connection
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
April 18, 2003
- Re: make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Thien-Thi Nguyen
- Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Thomas Dickey
- Re: Turning off use of Libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- make distcheck fails with 'does not support --help', Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: Environment Configuration for Test Execution, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Automake 1.7.3b uploaded (beta for 1.7.4), Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs. [lib]_CPPFLAGS, William S Fulton
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: How handle subdirectories with own Autotools stuff already??..., Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if noportability concerns???, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Tim Van Holder
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Earnie Boyd
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Eric Siegerman
- Re: Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Robert Collins
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Bob Proulx
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby
- Why does 'configure' look for localhost-g++ ???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac's for complex trees of source code?, Eric Siegerman
- Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac'sforcomplex trees of source code?, Eric Siegerman
- Re: How do a copy a file?, Eric Siegerman
April 17, 2003
- [BUG] config.status: error on rebuild Makefile [2], zaufi
- [BUG] config.status: error on rebuild Makefile, zaufi
- How do a copy a file?, Dr. David Kirkby
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- Turning off use of Libtool, William S Fulton
- Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Unknown
- Re: *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac'sforcomplex trees of source code?, Richard Dawe
- Re: Why manual says *don't* add config.h to _SOURCES definition!?!, Richard Dawe
- *Where* lots of _examples_ of Makefile.am/configure.ac's for complex trees of source code?, cs
- Best & most portable way to add *paths to headers* & *libraries*???, cs
- How handle subdirectories with own Autotools stuff already??..., cs
- Why manual says *don't* add config.h to _SOURCES definition!?!, cs
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Dale E Martin
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if noportability concerns???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules PART2, Sander Niemeijer
- Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Earnie Boyd
- Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules PART2, Juraj Hercek
- Re: Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules, Sander Niemeijer
- Automake 1.7.2 & using implicit rules, Juraj Hercek
- Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Stephen Torri
- Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, cs
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Nic Ferrier
- Re: Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, Bob Proulx
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Bob Proulx
April 16, 2003
- Possible to use Automake without Autoconf/config script?, cs
- Environment Configuration for Test Execution, Drummonds, Scott B
- Re: Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, Guido Draheim
- Re: Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, Guido Draheim
- Common to use Autotools just to avoid Makefile work even if no portability concerns???, cs
- Any tips for how do Makefile.am if LOTS of source files???, cs
- Re: Objective C on Mac OS X, Martin Wagner
- Re: Can I select a different compiler ??, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: Libtool libraries in checks?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Fwd: Re: automake questions, Martin Wagner
- Fwd: automake questions, Martin Wagner
- Re: automake, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
April 11, 2003
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: automake/libtool interoperability problem, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Raja R Harinath
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Eric Siegerman
- automake/libtool interoperability problem, Lars Hecking
- Re: Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
April 10, 2003
- Conference Newsletter, Conference News
- Problem with CVS HEAD, bootstrap, Perl 5.005_003, Richard Dawe
- Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Richard Dawe
- Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Ralf Corsepius
- Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: simple java compilation, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Lorenzo Bettini
- Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Eric Siegerman
- mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko
- Libtool libraries in checks?, Magnus Therning
- Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko
- mkdepend, Bruzzone Mirko
April 09, 2003
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Lorenzo Bettini
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Earnie Boyd
- Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Sebastian Huber
- Re: Can I peforma conditional tests???, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Re: Have I got an installation problem?????, Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Compile C code with C++ compiler, Ralf Corsepius
April 08, 2003
- Re: multiple definition of e.g., bin_PROGRAMS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Have I got an installation problem?????, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Andreas Schwab
- Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Dr. David Kirkby
- Compile C code with C++ compiler, Sebastian Huber
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bob Proulx
- Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Akim Demaille
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bill Moseley
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Earnie Boyd
- profesores de nuevas tecnologias, Daniel Belzer
- Re: /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Andreas Schwab
- kjk, Hisense
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Eric Siegerman
- /bin/bash: --gnu: command not found, Dr. David Kirkby
April 07, 2003
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Dr. David Kirkby
- simple java compilation, Nic Ferrier
- Re: Removing dependencies, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Removing dependencies, Steve M. Robbins
- Re: Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Bob Proulx
- Re: Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley
- Why do I need both AC_INIT and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE???, Dr. David Kirkby
- Re: Removing dependencies, Bob Proulx
- Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Akim Demaille
April 06, 2003
- Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Removing dependencies, Bill Moseley
- Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Removing dependencies, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: make sorts libraries at link stage, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Objects in multiple directories, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL in automake 1.7.3, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: `make install' and $(BUILT_SOURCES), Alexandre Duret-Lutz
April 02, 2003
- Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Bob Proulx
- Re: a general question about config.h files, Dale E Martin
- Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Paul Brook
- Re: Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: a general question about config.h files, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
- Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Richard Dawe
- Putting intermediate files in the distribution?, Bob Proulx
- multiple definition of e.g., bin_PROGRAMS, Jim Meyering
- Re: example of DEJATOOL being a list of names, Jonah Graham
|
|