|
|
Subject: Re: compiling the source failed - msg#00056
List: sysutils.autoconf.general
On Saturday 14 December 2002 00:17, you wro wrote:te:
> > From: w0o <woo@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:09:26 +0300
> >
> > While trying to compile a new ver of autoconf (2.57) i got
> >
> > ==snip-snip===
> > $ make
> > cd . && /bin/sh /home/woo/autoconf-2.57/config/missing --run autoconf
>
> It looks like the time stamps on your files are messed up somehow.
> The file "configure" should be newer than "configure.ac", e.g.:
>
> 8-arte $ TZ=UTC0 ls -l --full-time configure.ac configure
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 eggert eggert 92278 2002-12-03 08:01:20.000000000
> +0000 configure -rw-rw-r-- 1 eggert eggert 3531 2002-12-03
> 06:32:04.000000000 +0000 configure.ac
>
> If your timestamps differ, you need to reextract the files from the
> tar image without losing the time stamps.
Thanx... that was the problem
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: compiling the source failed
> From: w0o <woo@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:09:26 +0300
> While trying to compile a new ver of autoconf (2.57) i got
>
> ==snip-snip===
> $ make
> cd . && /bin/sh /home/woo/autoconf-2.57/config/missing --run autoconf
It looks like the time stamps on your files are messed up somehow.
The file "configure" should be newer than "configure.ac", e.g.:
8-arte $ TZ=UTC0 ls -l --full-time configure.ac configure
-rwxrwxr-x 1 eggert eggert 92278 2002-12-03 08:01:20.000000000 +0000
configure
-rw-rw-r-- 1 eggert eggert 3531 2002-12-03 06:32:04.000000000 +0000
configure.ac
If your timestamps differ, you need to reextract the files from the
tar image without losing the time stamps.
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
srcdir
Can someone tell me in what circumstances srcdir gets resolved into a full
pathname?
For some reason configure has recently started to provide a full pathname
for srcdir instead of just '.' which is perfectly adeqaute. I don't know
whatI may have changed to invoke this behaviour, but since I'm using OS/2
a full pathname in srcdir includes a drive letter and this appears to trip
up Make.
I guess I can use '--srcdir=.' but I didn't do that in the past and scrdir
got set to the current directory rather than being set explicitly. I'd
just like to know what I've inadvertantly changed to cause this.
--
John
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: compiling the source failed
> From: w0o <woo@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:09:26 +0300
> While trying to compile a new ver of autoconf (2.57) i got
>
> ==snip-snip===
> $ make
> cd . && /bin/sh /home/woo/autoconf-2.57/config/missing --run autoconf
It looks like the time stamps on your files are messed up somehow.
The file "configure" should be newer than "configure.ac", e.g.:
8-arte $ TZ=UTC0 ls -l --full-time configure.ac configure
-rwxrwxr-x 1 eggert eggert 92278 2002-12-03 08:01:20.000000000 +0000
configure
-rw-rw-r-- 1 eggert eggert 3531 2002-12-03 06:32:04.000000000 +0000
configure.ac
If your timestamps differ, you need to reextract the files from the
tar image without losing the time stamps.
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
srcdir
Can someone tell me in what circumstances srcdir gets resolved into a full
pathname?
For some reason configure has recently started to provide a full pathname
for srcdir instead of just '.' which is perfectly adeqaute. I don't know
whatI may have changed to invoke this behaviour, but since I'm using OS/2
a full pathname in srcdir includes a drive letter and this appears to trip
up Make.
I guess I can use '--srcdir=.' but I didn't do that in the past and scrdir
got set to the current directory rather than being set explicitly. I'd
just like to know what I've inadvertantly changed to cause this.
--
John
|
|