osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Re: autoreconf -s [patched patch] - msg#00238

List: sysutils.autoconf.general

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:05:03PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> diff -u -u -r1.679 autoconf.texi
> --- doc/autoconf.texi 26 Sep 2002 11:57:28 -0000 1.679
> +++ doc/autoconf.texi 26 Sep 2002 12:04:31 -0000
> @@ -1446,11 +1446,13 @@
> @item --install
> @itemx -i
> Copy missing auxiliary files. This option is similar to the option
> -@code{--add-missing} in @command{automake}.
> +@option{--add-missing} in @command{automake}. By default, file are
^^^^
files
> +copied; this can be changed with @option{--symlink}.
>
> @item --symlink
> @itemx -s
> -Instead of copying missing auxiliary files, install symbolic links.
> +When used with @option{--isntall}, install symbolic links to the missing
^^^^^^^
install
> +auxiliary files instead of copies.

...instead of copying them? Hmm, the wonders of ambiguous English. Is the
choice between installing and copying, or between symlinks and copies? :)

> @item --include=@var{dir}
> @itemx -I @var{dir}

--
berndfoobar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is probably better to bookmark than any
employer-specific email address I may have appearing in the headers.
Vanity page: http://www.tsct.co.za/~berndj/





Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: defined(IRIX)

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Philip Willoughby wrote: > Yesterday, Bill Moseley wrote: > > >Does anyone know what macro name I can use to detect when running on IRIX > >6.5? I don't have access to the machine so I can't poke around headers. > >I'm not sure if there's an autoconf solution, or if I just need to find out > >what name I can use. > > Why do you need to know if it's IRIX? There probably isn't an autoconf > test since the philosophy of autoconf is to test for features and not > platforms. Have you looked on ac-archive for a test for the feature/bug you > need to detect? (http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive) This is the same issuse I discussed here a week or so ago. We have a memory manager that aligns reads on sizeof(long), but that causes sigbus on some platforms when sizeof(long) == 4 but we need 8 byte alignment. I was never able to find "the" solution for testing this in our code and have resulted to testing for specific machines when the issue comes up. #if defined(__sparc__) || defined(IRIX) /* This is not exactly correct because not all __sparc__ machines require 8 */ #define PointerAlignmentSize 8 #else #define PointerAlignmentSize sizeof(long) #endif Someone pointed out the Postgres configure has a test, but didn't have time to work that out yet. > >Can I get gcc to dump the defined macros?A > > According to the man page the correct invocation is: > > gcc -E -dM <sourcefile.c> Thanks. At the end of 15 hours at the screen I failed to see that... -- Bill Moseley moseley@xxxxxxxx

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: autoreconf -s [patched patch]

Bernd Jendrissek wrote: --install means to install the file in the package, by whatever means. Default is to copy. --symlink means to effect the install using a symlink, instead of using a file copy.

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: autoreconf -s

Tim: | > You are right, thanks! What would you do? Change -s to => -i? | | Easiest would be to change the usage text from | | -i, --install copy missing auxiliary files | -s, --symlink instead of copying, install symbolic links | | to | | -i, --install copy missing auxiliary files | -s, --symlink create symbolic links to missing auxiliary files I don't think this makes it really any easier to read :) I'm installing this: Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <akim@xxxxxxxx> * bin/autoreconf.in: Clarify that -s is meaningless without -i. Reported by Ralf Corsepius. * doc/autoconf.texi (autoreconf Invocation): Likewise. Index: bin/autoreconf.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/bin/autoreconf.in,v retrieving revision 1.103 diff -u -u -r1.103 autoreconf.in --- bin/autoreconf.in 13 Sep 2002 06:59:56 -0000 1.103 +++ bin/autoreconf.in 26 Sep 2002 12:04:08 -0000 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ -d, --debug don't remove temporary files -f, --force consider all files obsolete -i, --install copy missing auxiliary files - -s, --symlink instead of copying, install symbolic links + -s, --symlink with -i, install symbolic links instead of copies Library directories: -B, --prepend-include=DIR prepend directory DIR to search path Index: doc/autoconf.texi =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/autoconf.texi,v retrieving revision 1.679 diff -u -u -r1.679 autoconf.texi --- doc/autoconf.texi 26 Sep 2002 11:57:28 -0000 1.679 +++ doc/autoconf.texi 26 Sep 2002 12:04:31 -0000 @@ -1446,11 +1446,13 @@ @item --install @itemx -i Copy missing auxiliary files. This option is similar to the option -@code{--add-missing} in @command{automake}. +@option{--add-missing} in @command{automake}. By default, file are +copied; this can be changed with @option{--symlink}. @item --symlink @itemx -s -Instead of copying missing auxiliary files, install symbolic links. +When used with @option{--isntall}, install symbolic links to the missing +auxiliary files instead of copies. @item --include=@var{dir} @itemx -I @var{dir}

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: autoreconf -s [patched patch]

Bernd Jendrissek wrote: --install means to install the file in the package, by whatever means. Default is to copy. --symlink means to effect the install using a symlink, instead of using a file copy.
Sign up for updates to this mailing list. email:
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by