Re: time series snafu

Unfortunately, I'm completely unfamiliar with ARIMA or time series
analysis in general.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:52:16PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     Jason Stover <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
     
     > So: Should I junk this whole thing, or check it in? I'm hoping
     > everyone will say "forget it and start on the GLM procedure." In any
     > case, I think innovations.c should probably stay where it is, since it
     > could be useful in the future.

I have to agree with that part.
     
     In my opinion, the most important thing is that the code that you
     wrote be preserved somewhere so that, later, you or someone else
     can find it if there's interest.  So I'd suggest checking it in
     so that it becomes part of the "historical record", as it were,
     even if you turn around and remove it soon after, and even if it
     has important known bugs, etc.


Perhaps we can start an "experimental" module in CVS.  That way we
have a record of it, but won't be something that get's checked out in
normal use.

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
pspp-dev@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev