Subject: Re: changing terminal-width while program is running - msg#00217
List: shells.bash.bugs
Please read the Bash FAQ, question E11.
why is "checkwinsize" disabled by default? Does it have native side-effects?
Because not everyone wants it.
Again: why would anybody not want it? The best reason would be negative
side-effects, but you didn't mention any. So you could have kept
everything like it is for bash 2.x, but could have changed the default
for bash 3.0, but now that it's realeased ...
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: changing terminal-width while program is running
> > Please read the Bash FAQ, question E11.
>
> why is "checkwinsize" disabled by default? Does it have native side-effects?
Because not everyone wants it.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet )
Live...Laugh...Love
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@xxxxxxxxxxx http://tiswww.tis.cwru.edu/~chet/
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Changes..
----------- Trend GateLock 病毒防護通知 (主機:higp7.gatelock.com.tw)
** 中毒檔案 Alive_condom.cpl 已刪除。
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Trend GateLock 病毒防護通知 (主機:higp7.gatelock.com.tw)
** 在檔案 Alive_condom.cpl 中發現病毒 WORM_BAGLE.Z。
無法清除病毒,中毒檔案已刪除。
---------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bug-bash mailing list
Bug-bash@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash