|
Re: Just say no to VLANS: msg#00079security.wireless
You have taken a hostile attitude on a technical discussion. I find it disappointing when people interject emotion into a technical discussion personally. First, you stated that you were surprised at the frequency at which I find poorly secured networks. To be honest I find that well-configured and well-secured networks are the exception not the rule. Concerning the vulnerability attacks: If everyone in the world took your excellent recommendations and implemented them throughout their switched infrastructure then there wouldn't be any issues w/ VLANs. Unfortunately, as I said before this is usually not the case. Not to mention this thread was started by someone that was new to VLAN's asking about using them for security. In a sense you are telling someone asking about a kite how to launch a rocket ship. You can claim BS and get abusive all you like but it doesn't change my opinion that if you are providing wireless access to the public then you should physically separate the networks or at least firewall them off from one another. I'm done with this, have a great day. -- tsudohnimh www.knowthenetwork.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Just say no to VLANS: 00079, Cedric Blancher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Just say no to VLANS: 00079, Dogten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Just say no to VLANSi: 00079, Cedric Blancher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Just say no to VLANS: 00079, Cedric Blancher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |