logo       

Re: format strings vulns in /bin/login and /usr/bin/passwd: msg#00057

security.vulnerabilities

Subject: Re: format strings vulns in /bin/login and /usr/bin/passwd



> Hello while doing a scan for format strings vulns on util-linux package
> it came back with the following results.
>
> ./login.c:398 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:425 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:597 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:614 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:775 FUNC printf
> ./login.c:796 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:800 FUNC fprintf
> ./login.c:1109 FUNC syslog
...

This doesn't mean that these are vulnerable function calls. For
example

fprintf(stderr, "Sorry, your password is invalid");
or
syslog(LOG_NOTICE, "User %s is a moron", username);

are completly legitimate ways to call these functions and don't
have any vulnerability in them that anyone knows about currently.
The presense of a function that *could* be used poorly doesn't
mean it *is* used poorly. Sounds like you're just grepping for
potential abuses. Now you need to go and look at how the functions
are actually called. For example

syslog(LOG_NOTICE, some_char_array_using_user_input);

is definately a bad way to write it. Whether the call is actually
exploitable is a different question. But regardless it should be fixed.



--
Brian Hatch Linux. The OS for
Systems and those with an IQ
Security Engineer greater than 98.
http://www.ifokr.org/bri/

Every message PGP signed

Attachment: pgpwU8sBogVf9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise