|
RE: Website "Scanner": msg#00019security.vulnerabilities
I think we're safely in the realms of "authorised security assessments" here. Typically, part of an assessment will be to determine how much information an unprivileged attacker may gather from a site, for example using cgi-scanners or dictionary orientated attacks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nelson Sampaio Araujo Junior > [mailto:nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 09 January 2003 01:52 > To: sullo@xxxxxxxx; backed.up.by.2048.bit.encryption@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: webappsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vuln-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Website "Scanner" > > > Well, > > That sounds you're not doing something legal with it. If you > are the owner of the server/system, just dir or list them. > Another hint is that if the administrator has disabled the > Index option, its probably because you can't do it (legally speaking). > > - Nelson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <backed.up.by.2048.bit.encryption@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <sullo@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: <webappsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <vuln-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:22 PM > Subject: Re: Website "Scanner" > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > > > > On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 14:21:16 -0800 sullo@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > >2) take all the files an mix them with all the directories > from the > > >scan database, so that: > > > /dir1/file1.html > > > /dir2/file2.html > > > /dir3/file3.html > > > turns into requests for > > > /dir1/file1.html > > > /dir1/file2.html > > > /dir1/file3.html > > > /dir2/file1.html > > > /dir2/file2.html > > > /dir2/file3.html > > > /dir3/file1.html > > > /dir3/file2.html > > > /dir3/file3.html > > > > > > > > > Yes, this is more the idea. We are not looking for vulns. > or xploits, > rather trying to intelligently "guess" what else is in that directory. > Either through dictionary use or other use. For example the > following is > publicly accessible: > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/new_products/bigwinner2003.html > > > > We want to find out what else might be in "new_products" so > we plug in say > the words "big" "winner" "2003" and let our dictionary spin: > > > > biggerwinner2003.html - nothing > > bigloser2002.html - hit > > > > etc. > > > > Combining the dictionary and words from a specific site or > files visible > publicly, we try to guess the names of whatever else might be in that > directory. > > > > You can do this manually with small time sites and obvious > file names e.g. > index1.html...index2.html etc. Even annualreport2002.html is > visible, try > annualreport.2003.html > > > > You can guess and hit on files that are not intended for public > consumption. > > > > If it can be automated with user input for obvious > keywords, you probably > could strike many interesting and sensitive files in the directory. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: Hush 2.2 (Java) > > Note: This signature can be verified at > https://www.hushtools.com/verify > > > > > wnUEARECADUFAj4csi8uHGJhY2tlZC51cC5ieS4yMDQ4LmJpdC5lbmNyeXB0aW9uQGh1 > > c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDEHQGvBp4eRGE4AJ4joBLhRlZYcBX7sxnOmgYPfbtYOgCfUFun > > Y0PA+csb++5g+pM+c/0Bkok= > > =SFPk > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > > Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get > > FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 > > > > Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: > > https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427 > > > > > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Website "Scanner": 00019, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Website "Scanner": 00019, Ian Griffiths |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Website "Scanner"i: 00019, Kevin Spett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Website "Scanner": 00019, Todd Charron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |