|
RE: Values to use for a salt?: msg#00023security.programming
> From: Marian Ion [mailto:marian.ion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:01 AM > Don't you think using extendedASCII set will dramatically increase the > performance of any algorithm currently in use? Imagine what a > pass like "|¤W-|[V.|1D-|`â-|Ë3-|%-|F0-| " means for a cracker: ... Enlarging the password alphabet has the same effect as lengthening the password. The larger the domain of possible passwords, the more space an attacker has to search. That's a basic characteristic of passwords which should be familiar to anyone working with password-based authentication. > Will you still need salt and others? That depends on your threat model and the strength of the passwords you're protecting. Even if your system allows strong passwords, users may use weak ones if they're allowed to do so. If your threat model includes defending against an attacker who has resources to precompute a dictionary that includes the weakest passwords permitted by your system, then adding salt would be a way to address that threat. -- Michael Wojcik Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Values to use for a salt?: 00023, Chris Alfeld |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Values to use for a salt?: 00023, Eric Knight |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Values to use for a salt?i: 00023, Michael Wojcik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Values to use for a salt?: 00023, Marian Ion |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |