|
Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: msg#00131security.nmap.devel
That looks quite interesting. However I just tried it against a box I know have a firewall running on one port and it didn't detect it. It should also look at the IPID and perhaps the window size. The IPID is often a dead giveaway. On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:15:49 +0000, "DePriest, Jason R." <jrdepriest@xxxxxxxxx> said: > On 12/28/06, Sina Bahram wrote: > > I am using nmap 4.21 alpha 1, which I believe is the latest version of nmap > > released. > > > > I don't have a nmap -sQ option > > > > Is this something I am totally missing? > > > > I don't even remember this option ever being introduced. > > > > It sounds extremely useful. > > > > Take care, > > Sina > > > > Theory - http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q3/att-0282/QSCAN > > But I can only find this patch against 4.20ALPHA4 - > http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2006/q3/0282.html > > Did it not get included in the final 4.20? > > -Jason > > _______________________________________________ > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev > Archived at http://SecLists.Org -- Hans Nilsson hasse_gg@xxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: 00131, DePriest, Jason R. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: 00131, Alan Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmarki: 00131, DePriest, Jason R. |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: 00131, doug |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |