|
Re: nmap-4.20 portability patch: msg#00123security.nmap.devel
Peter O'Gorman wrote: > __FUNCTION__ is not portable, this is replaced in the patch with > "function_name" even where that is silly. Isn't this silly everywhere? Instead of putting the function name in the format string of the printf() you have it converted with a %s. Did you just run a script to replace it? > // C++ style comments don't work with non-c++ compilers on some > platofrms. I sent in a patch for this just a little bit ago, but no biggie. This should probably just be categorized under the "not all our compilers are c99 capable" along with the va_copy() and variable length arrays things below. > hpux does not have va_copy. ... > variable length arrays is a c99 feature, but not all our compilers > are c99 capable. > ... > Thanks, > Peter I hope I'm not coming across mean or anything, I just got done driving across a two states :) Kris Katterjohn _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: 00123, Hans Nilsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New Nmap vs SinFP benchmark: 00123, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman |
| Previous by Thread: | nmap-4.20 portability patchi: 00123, Peter O'Gorman |
| Next by Thread: | script udate broken: 00123, Gisle Vanem |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |