|
Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: msg#00113security.nmap.devel
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:48:23PM -0800, doug@xxxxxxxx wrote: [..] > When you execute a version scan (-sV or -A) Nmap will also fingerprint > *services* at the *application layer* which, it turns out, is often a > fairly robust, reliable OS fingerprinting method. I rarely ever use -O [..] I conquer. OS fingerprinting by TCP/IP stack analysis is just ... a fun thing to work on :) -- ^ ___ ___ http://www.GomoR.org/ <-+ | / __ |__/ Systems & Security Engineer | | \__/ | \ ---[ zsh$ alias psed='perl -pe ' ]--- | +--> Net::Frame <=> http://search.cpan.org/~gomor/ <---+ _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: 00113, GomoR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Question about mswin32/*pcap*: 00113, Kris Katterjohn |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark resultsi: 00113, DePriest, Jason R. |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: 00113, GomoR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |