|
Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: msg#00111security.nmap.devel
On 12/21/06, doug@xxxxxxxx <doug@xxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > When you execute a version scan (-sV or -A) Nmap will also fingerprint > *services* at the *application layer* which, it turns out, is often a > fairly robust, reliable OS fingerprinting method. I rarely ever use -O > on my own machines because of the verbose information most OpenSSH > daemons are configured to give: > > $ ./nmap -sV -p 22 localhost > > Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2006-12-21 14:22 PST > Interesting ports on localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): > PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION > 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 3.8.1p1 Debian 8.sarge.4 (protocol 2.0) > Service Info: OS: Linux > > Similarly, Mac OS is easily recognised at the application layer > through AFP/Apple remote desktop VNC, Windows through > SMB/IIS/Exchange/etc, AIX through its "kerberised" rsh and so on. > > Doug > > That makes me wonder if anyone has thought about a good way to incorporate this sort of extra effort programatically into nmap. It may be too much effort and be way out of scope of nmap and something more suited for fat tools like Retina, Internet Scanner, and Nessus. I would hate to over complicate nmap and make it bloated and slow. I don't know how much weight nmap puts on which ports are open as opposed to just the responses it receives from ports that are open. I also don't know how much weight nmap puts on the version information that is discovered, if any at all. -Jason _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: 00111, doug |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: 00111, GomoR |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark resultsi: 00111, doug |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SinFP 2.06, new signatures, benchmark results: 00111, GomoR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |