|
|
Subject: Re: Nmap Attack Scripting Language - msg#00133
List: security.nmap.devel
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:06:06PM +0200, Diman Todorov wrote:
>
> If you do think that vulnerability scans in nmap are useful, please
> beta test http://xover.mud.at/~diman/nmap-4.10LUA.tar.bz2 and drop me
> a few lines of feedback.
I agree, and I would love to see more people test this and post their
feedback. Scripting support could be a very powerful addition to
Nmap, and we're lucky to have Diman spending this whole summer working
on it. I hope to play with it more soon as well.
Cheers,
-F
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: Nmap 4.20ALPHA2
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:02:46AM -0400, kx wrote:
> Was just finishing up patches for windows when you emailed this out =)
>
> Made all necessary edits to nmap.vcproj so it includes the new source
> files, copies the new resources, and fixed old issues where it wasn't
> copying nmap.xsl (it was ignoring the .xsl extension) and there were
> some odd characters at the end of the copy commands.
>
> Only issues in osscan2.cc were a typo inside a WIN32 ifdef block and
> stupid log issues as described before with VS 2005.
Thanks, I have applied this for ALPHA3.
Cheers,
-F
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: SYN Scan values - article
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:16:19AM -0400, kx wrote:
> Does anyone have any packet logs to say how often the DF bit is set
> in the first SYN. I think I was seeing it always set on Linux and
> Windows XP.
More systems sets the DF bit but there are also some firewalls that
clear it while forwarding the traffic.
> Re: the RSTs, is it better to allow the host OS to send RSTs or not?
I think it is better to allow it. This was already discussed last
year, check this thread:
http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-dev/2005/Jan-Mar/0007.html
http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-dev/2005/Jan-Mar/0003.html
Martin Mačok
ICT Security Consultant
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: 2006 Tool Survey Released - SecTools.Org
>
> I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong:
>
> alex@router:~/nmap-4.10LUA$ ./nmap -sC localhost
> Scantype C not supported
sorry about that :)
I had bogged up the scp command so that I copied
the latest nmapLUA version somewhere else without
overwriting the old version...
you were trying to execute the older version which
didn't have cmd line arguments
I have update the version, it should work now:
http://xover.mud.at/~diman/nmap-4.10LUA.tar.bz2
also sorry it took me so long to respond but i just
found a nasty linking bug which i was fixing all day
on a side note:
in the luasocket src directory there's a file called config
make sure you
#LUAINC=-I/usr/local/include/lua50
LUAINC=-I/usr/local/include
and
#INSTALL_TOP_SHARE=/usr/local/share/lua/5.0
#INSTALL_TOP_LIB=/usr/local/lib/lua/5.0
INSTALL_TOP_SHARE=/usr/local/share/lua/5.1
INSTALL_TOP_LIB=/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1
comment the lines saying 5.0 and uncomment the lines saying 5.1 ;)
let me know if it still doesn't work
cheers
Diman
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: 2006 Tool Survey Released - SecTools.Org
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:22:32PM -0700, Fyodor wrote:
>
> Speaking of SecTools.Org, has anyone submitted it to Slashdot? I
> specifically added mirror sites this morning to be sure the site could
> handle a traffic flood, but my servers aren't even breaking a sweat
> yet! Also, it would help if people with Digg accounts Digg the story:
Haha, boy was I overconfident! I got my comeuppance this morning when
I woke up to find SecTools.Org featured on Slashdot, Digg, and the top
of the del.icio.us "most popular" page all at once. My server was no
match for that onslaught, and the site was just crawling for several
hours. I have since distributed the load amongst more mirror sites
and everything seems fine now.
Still, thanks to everyone who spread the word about SecTools. It took
a long time to create (even with a lot of help from Doug), so I'm glad
to see people finding it useful!
Cheers,
-F
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
|
|