|
Re: Snort signatures for PBX: msg#00210security.ids.snort.sigs
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 07:23, Teicher, Mark wrote: > Has anyone developed signatures for IP-based PBXs?? Yo Mark, how are things going? Regarding PBXes, what concerns do you have? Are you thinking about attack signatures against the respective Unix system (mostly SCO from what I've seen), or are you concerned about attacks against VoIP and other IP-based telephony protocols? Cheers, Frank
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Snort signatures for PBX: 00210, Matt Jonkman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update: 00210, matt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Snort signatures for PBXi: 00210, Matt Jonkman |
| Next by Thread: | SID 480 - False Positive: 00210, Firth, Matt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |