|
Re: Snort signatures for PBX: msg#00209security.ids.snort.sigs
I haven't seen any myself. If you've got one running send us some packet dumps of bad things happening. Would be an interesting set to have. Matt Teicher, Mark wrote: Has anyone developed signatures for IP-based PBXs?? -- -------------------------------------------- Matthew Jonkman, CISSP Senior Security Engineer Infotex 765-429-0398 Direct Anytime 765-448-6847 Office 866-679-5177 24x7 NOC my.infotex.com www.offsitefilter.com -------------------------------------------- NOTICE: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmittal or retransmittal of information contained in this email by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ------------------------------------------------------- This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Additional False Positives for rule 1:498: 00209, Nigel Houghton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Snort signatures for PBX: 00209, Frank Knobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | Snort signatures for PBXi: 00209, Teicher, Mark |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Snort signatures for PBX: 00209, Frank Knobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |