|
Re: Rules utilisation: msg#00162security.ids.snort.sigs
You're very right. That's a definite need, and something we're working toward at bleeding snort. What we hope to have is a form of voting system, or a confidence level. The success of that kind of thing very much depends on participation. We're just about done with a web based rule manager and database. Once that's out and functional we'll start looking at the mechanism of getting a confidence level of these. Ideas on how to do so are definitely welcome. I've been mulling the idea of some form of script mechanisms to automate some anonymous reporting similar to dshield, but that wouldn't give us a differentiation for a false positive or true positive hit. That would require human interpretation. Relying on voluntry voting likely wouldn't be that reliable. THe trend would be to only vote on rules that caused problems thus only showing us a negative confidence. The process of manually voting would be rather tedious as well. Other ideas anyone? Matt Chich Thierry wrote: Hello, ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: reporting false positives...: 00162, Matthew Watchinski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Rules utilisation: 00162, Byron Copeland |
| Previous by Thread: | Rules utilisationi: 00162, Chich Thierry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rules utilisation: 00162, Byron Copeland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |