logo       

Re: Classtype accuracy?: msg#00159

security.ids.snort.sigs

Subject: Re: Classtype accuracy?

Hum, guess so since the vulnerability executes as the user running IE, we'll get that fixed.

Cheers,
-matt


nnposter wrote:

I have recently run into several cases where the rule classtype seems incorrect. As an example, 2671 (WEB-CLIENT bitmap BitmapOffset integer overflow attempt) is classified as "attempted-admin", instead of
"attempted-user".

Could somebody at Sourcefire be so kind and explain the current classification rules? Or is the example above just a mistake?

TIA,
nnposter


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise