|
Re: False Positive: msg#00126security.ids.snort.sigs
At 03:47 PM 10/15/2004, Mark Buchanan wrote: Ok, I took a look at the packet and this is what I found. First, Take a second look.. This time don't start at the begining of the file... Snort should start looking at offset 5, but after the UDP header since it's a UDP rule. The first 5 bytes of content (ignored) should be 02 01 00 04 07 then 7 bytes of community then A0 3E (15 bytes). There's another 04 00, but it's at offset 17/18 relative to the end of the UDP header. Unless there's some bug that allows snort to mis-parse the content rules and run them relative to the start of packet, instead of start of layer content. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: False Positive: 00126, Matt Kettler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Plugins-writers] New Spyware Project with Nessus and BleedingSnort!!!: 00126, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: False Positivei: 00126, Matt Kettler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: False Positive: 00126, nnposter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |