|
Re: False Positive: msg#00122security.ids.snort.sigs
Mark Buchanan wrote: > Ok, I took a look at the packet and this is what I found. First, > while the offset is 5 and that is where Snort started looking, the > depth to look was 15. The |04 00| sequence was found at 5 (offset) + > 13/14. The |04 00| combination was actually found in the Request ID > field of the packet as apposed to the Community string. > > With that said and after reading a little of the snmp_api.h code from > ucd-snmp, I wonder if you could do set this sig to a depth of 2. This would be vulnerable to a false negative. Any larger ASN.1 sequence will cause byte at offset 1 to change into a series of bytes, which shifts the rest of the payload rightward. > It appears that the 5 + 2 byte is the length of the community string, > allowing for a community string of 0 - 255 characters. The first > digit (5 + 1), I didn't find a reference to. 0x04 = OCTET STRING Cheers, nnposter ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: False Positive: 00122, nnposter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: False Positive: 00122, Matt Kettler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: False Positivei: 00122, Mark Buchanan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: False Positive: 00122, Matt Kettler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |