|
Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers: msg#00043security.ids.snort.sigs
I definitely agree there. But it's not an option in all nets unfortunately. We use the existing porn rules to just catch major offenses on nets we cover that don't/can't/don't want to/ proxy and filter. They're pretty effective there. The intelligent p*rn surfer can sometimes get in under the radar, but if you're doing so at work under threat of termination you're probably not the intelligent one we're looking for. :) And as was previously mentioned, you need to be sure you have a zero privacy expectation statement in your acceptable use policy. The terms for the child porn are just too generic alone I think. The terms for the existing porn rules are very specific and shouldn't ever occur in normal and acceptable business communication. Not the case in the preteen rules. But putting more thought into those: if you wanted to be able to quickly identify that a porn violation posibly included under-18 (and thus VERY illegal) content maybe we could put up rules with the preteen terms and a pcre for some of the existing porn terms. Something like: alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS -> $HOME_NET any ( msg:"Possible Pre-teen P*rn"; content:"preteen"; nocase; within:40; pcre:"m/f*ck|r*pe|b*sm|wh*re|/"; sid:; rev:1:) (obfuscated to avoid getting 100 replys from bad spam/content filters) The idea being that preteen is an acceptable word unless in close proximity to another unacceptable one. Anyone see issues with this? The best bet is to not use IDS for porn, but sometimes it's the only tool available. Matt twebster@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Snort can certainly detect porn and child porn traffic but as stated -- -------------------------------------------- Matthew Jonkman, CISSP Senior Security Engineer Infotex 765-429-0398 Direct Anytime 765-448-6847 Office 866-679-5177 24x7 NOC my.infotex.com www.offsitefilter.com -------------------------------------------- NOTICE: The information contained in this email is confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmittal or retransmittal of information contained in this email by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: CAUTION: Long Rant!!! Re: Broken 1429.2 (POLICY poll.gotomypc.com access): 00043, Brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CAUTION: Long Rant!!! Re: Broken 1429.2 (POLICY poll.gotomypc.com access): 00043, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | MUA: Lotus Notes (was Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers)i: 00043, Chris Green |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers: 00043, nnposter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |