|
Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers: msg#00036security.ids.snort.sigs
Good idea, but I think the falses would be pretty high on the average net. On your own it's probably better. We cover a lot of school nets and gov't social work typoes of places, so there'd be a ton of legitimate uses for the words. But if we could add a second one to it, something like sex or maybe. Although that's too easily avoided. Maybe the word free, or something. I'm not a kiddie porn kinda guy so I don't know what they'd be using as search terms there. Ideas? matt Kalbfleisch, Gary wrote: Sorry if this has been addressed here before. I am new to this list and couldn't find anything on the subject. I have added the following rules to my system with some interesting results. I occasionally get a few false positives from these but each time I have seen a significant volume of hits I have found evidence of surfers actively searching for child pornography. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broken 1429.2 (POLICY poll.gotomypc.com access): 00036, Matt Jonkman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers: 00036, Erick Mechler |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfersi: 00036, Eric Hines |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rules for catching kiddy porn surfers: 00036, Erick Mechler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |