|
portrange: msg#00021security.ids.snort.devel
Just curious - why doesn't snort support the BPF portrange expression, where it otherwise seems to match up with tcpdump's expression syntax exactly? This would be extremely useful for sites that e.g. have their ftpaccess files set so that all passive ports are opened in a certain range - then you could do snort -A fast -i br0 not dst portange XXX-XXXX rather than having to do "not dst port X and not dst port X+1 and ..." which, on my box, with 1000 ports, makes snort start rather slowly. BTW, here is the error I get when I try to use the portrange option. Maybe it's my version of pcap? (I don't think so because the same expression works fine in tcpdump). ERROR: OpenPcap() FSM compilation failed: unknown host 'portrange' -- John Newman Systems Administrator, WebXess Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: sfportscan logging: 00021, Eric Lauzon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: portrange: 00021, John Newman |
| Previous by Thread: | sfportscan loggingi: 00021, John Newman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: portrange: 00021, John Newman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |