|
Re: sfportscan logging: msg#00019security.ids.snort.devel
John, Can you provide me with more details about the inconsistencies that you see? We are aware that sfportscan has some inconsistencies in its output (and that the output is often confusing), and will address those as soon as we can, in our schedule. Still, detecting portscans is not an exact science, and it's possible for sfportscan to get confused. I definitely would not recommend going backto any earlier portscan--in fact they've all been deprecated. Try to continue tuning and see if you can get better results. Thanks for the report. -Andy John Newman wrote: Hello, ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | sfportscan logging: 00019, John Newman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: sfportscan logging: 00019, Eric Lauzon |
| Previous by Thread: | sfportscan loggingi: 00019, John Newman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: sfportscan logging: 00019, Eric Lauzon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |