|
Re: Unusually High Client DNS Query Volume -- lots of hits.: msg#00194security.ids.snort.bleedingsnort
Matt Jonkman wrote: > That's a much better sig than the original. Whoever wrote that original > one is some kind of moron... :) > > I'll post this asap. Appreciate you expanding on the concept! > > BLEEDING-EDGE POLICY Possible Spambot -- Host DNS MX Query High Count <https://ruru.insec/placid/summary.py?%20&timebefore=86400%20%20&signame=BLEEDING-EDGE%20POLICY%20Possible%20Spambot%20--%20Host%20DNS%20MX%20Query%20High%20Count%20&ipdst=distinct%20&groupby=signatures> is *much* better I'm getting thousands of hits off the foundry boxes in front of our MTAs and bugger all else! I'll tweak the oinkmaster config to change the source field and all should be hunky dory! Thanks Chris! Russell |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: P0F in Snort?: 00194, Jack Pepper |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unusually High Client DNS Query Volume -- lots of hits.: 00194, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unusually High Client DNS Query Volume -- lots of hits.i: 00194, Matt Jonkman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unusually High Client DNS Query Volume -- lots of hits.: 00194, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |