|
Re: Stormy P2P bot Sigs -- may be SKYPE ?: msg#00182security.ids.snort.bleedingsnort
Matt Jonkman wrote: > Russell Fulton wrote: > >> Hmmmm... My edonkey alerts have gone crazy recently. I know that at >> least some of the machines (the ones I checked ) are not doing any p2p >> file sharing, nor is there any signs of infection or compromise. All 3 >> however were running Skype. Is it possible that changes have been made >> to the skype protocol which results in a lot of packets with 0XE3 at the >> start? >> > > Looked into some basic skype pcaps and they shouldn't be triggering the > edonkey sigs. Could skype be using edonkey to pull updates or something? > > Could you turn off skype on a few of those and see if the hits persist? > We don't have direct control of the machines and skype is perfectly legal on our network. I'll examine my argus logs and see if I can get something I that I can positively identify as SKYPE. There are a few IPs that they contact at the start of a session IIRC. Russell |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stormy P2P bot Sigs -- may be SKYPE ?: 00182, Russell Fulton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Loads of new Spyware Signatures: 00182, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stormy P2P bot Sigs -- may be SKYPE ?i: 00182, Matt Jonkman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stormy P2P bot Sigs -- may be SKYPE ?: 00182, Dave Killion |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |