|
Re: P0F in Snort?: msg#00172security.ids.snort.bleedingsnort
Michael Scheidell wrote: >> > My anti-spam engine already uses p0f ;-) given to us via amavisd-new. > > Interesting all the companies that still use windows server 2000 service > pack 2 ... :) Can you tell what the rate of spam is from non-server OSs? Like XP, NT workstation, Me, etc? If there is a high rate there, then that's some validation that there's possibility here. Matt > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm) > For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Bleeding-sigs mailing list > Bleeding-sigs-WwB1pFISwSkm7effSn6vN9HuzzzSOjJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.bleedingthreats.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bleeding-sigs -- -------------------------------------------- Matthew Jonkman Bleeding Edge Threats 765-429-0398 765-807-3060 fax http://www.bleedingthreats.net -------------------------------------------- PGP: http://www.bleedingthreats.com/mattjonkman.asc |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: P0F in Snort?: 00172, tom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: P0F in Snort?: 00172, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: P0F in Snort?i: 00172, Michael Scheidell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: P0F in Snort?: 00172, Martin Holste |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |