Re: definition

There is really nothing to see except a new MD5 and re release of the
rules. Basically the fix was rolled in and the previously released
version replaced.

Matt Jonkman wrote:
> How was it resolved? I didn't see anything, can't find anything.
> 
> Any help appreciated.
> 
> Matt
> 
> Jason wrote:
>> This should now be resolved.
>>
>>
>> Matt Jonkman wrote:
>>> If I pay for a home license, can we get a resolution to the missing dce
>>> flowbit issue? That's been outstanding for some time now. :)
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Jason wrote:
>>>> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>>>> Jason wrote:
>>>>>>> I definitely agree that SF makes snort development go around. 100%.
>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>> the rules ain't free anymore, nor open. A change from a 5 day delay to
>>>>>>> 30 didn't do a thing to help the community. It just has moved them to
>>>>>>> begin to rely on us more.
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>> $30 for VRT rules for the average person is well within reach and
>>>>>> provides coverage as soon as it is available instead of 5 days later. I
>>>>>> think that it is a very fair balance. Corporate entities making a
>>>>>> profit
>>>>>> off this work should be able to provide a bit more... Quid pro Quo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   
>>>>> $30?  its $500.
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.snort.org/vrt/why_subscribe.html
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bleeding-sigs mailing list
>>>> Bleeding-sigs-WwB1pFISwSkm7effSn6vN9HuzzzSOjJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.bleedingthreats.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bleeding-sigs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bleeding-sigs mailing list
>> Bleeding-sigs-WwB1pFISwSkm7effSn6vN9HuzzzSOjJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.bleedingthreats.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bleeding-sigs
>