Re: definition

This should now be resolved.


Matt Jonkman wrote:
> If I pay for a home license, can we get a resolution to the missing dce
> flowbit issue? That's been outstanding for some time now. :)
> 
> Matt
> 
> Jason wrote:
>>
>> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> Jason wrote:
>>>>> I definitely agree that SF makes snort development go around. 100%.
>>>>> But
>>>>> the rules ain't free anymore, nor open. A change from a 5 day delay to
>>>>> 30 didn't do a thing to help the community. It just has moved them to
>>>>> begin to rely on us more.
>>>>>     
>>>> $30 for VRT rules for the average person is well within reach and
>>>> provides coverage as soon as it is available instead of 5 days later. I
>>>> think that it is a very fair balance. Corporate entities making a
>>>> profit
>>>> off this work should be able to provide a bit more... Quid pro Quo.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>> $30?  its $500.
>>>
>>
>> http://www.snort.org/vrt/why_subscribe.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bleeding-sigs mailing list
>> Bleeding-sigs-WwB1pFISwSkm7effSn6vN9HuzzzSOjJt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.bleedingthreats.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bleeding-sigs
>