|
Re: Testing OpenVPN?: msg#00276security.firewalls.m0n0wall
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Vincent Fleuranceau wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in replacing the official IPsec feature (based on > racoon) with the unofficial OpenVPN port, in gateway-to-gateway VPN > configuration? Well, "replacing" would certainly be a bad idea, for at least a couple of reasons: 1) OpenVPN is less interoperable then IPsec, since you won't find it on many commercial routers. 2) Tunneling through a user program is considerably more CPU-intensive, which is a significant factor on hardware like Soekris and WRAP boards. > More: is there a way to get a pre-build net4501 image with m0n0-ovpn, > for testing purpose? How about just investigating what's wrong when your IPsec tunnel stops working? Did you ever get the PPTP link set up so you can view the state of the remote without depending on IPsec? Fixing something that almost works is likely to be easier than implementing something entirely new. Fred Wright |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Full IPv6: 00276, Fred Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: wanted traffic blocked from in to out, why?: 00276, Frederick Page |
| Previous by Thread: | Testing OpenVPN?i: 00276, Vincent Fleuranceau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Testing OpenVPN?: 00276, Vincent Fleuranceau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |