|
|
Mozy Online Backup: 2GB Free. Automatic. Secure.
Subject: Re: Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project - msg#00037
List: security.firewalls.m0n0wall.devel
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Alex M wrote:
Valemont, is not the manufacturer of the board.
I'm sure I pointed that out.
Are you talking to lunny at VNC?
No.
Or actual manufacturer?
Yes.
Lunny buys at the agent said in "thousands" and his suppliers can
sale the board retail for 72$
Why you considering bord as not good idea? Also I think we can get
a bit
commercial here, since its for the good of community after all.
I think the board represents a high degree of difficulty for a
FreeBSD port.
Its one thing to have a solution that is slightly too expensive
(versus 'wishes'), its quite another
to have no solution because its taking a long time to get FreeBSD
running. (a pre-requisite for
m0n0wall running, I might add.)
I think the board is somewhat under-powered for FreeBSD. The 175MHz
clockspeed might be OK,
but the CPU can't address more than 4MB of flash without jumping
through hoops (implementing segmentation).
I think you're perhaps unprepared for the realities of what it would
take to put together a 10,000 unit order in order
to drive the pricing you've been quoted.
Jim
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
RE: Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
Irman, why do you need USB? If you need it for slash drive then I would say
we can use anything even build in once as long as it serves the purpuse
_____
From: Imran K [mailto:gururug@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:02 PM
To: Alex M
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
I think the board should have USB ports...
On 3/7/07, Alex M <radiussupport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Ok here is the list of all models by that manufacturer:
http://www.lrcommunications.net/mono/WP54.pdf
I just got reply and they offering me to use WP18 model. Will try to force
them to bring price down.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Sharp [mailto: leesharp@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:30 AM
Cc: 'Mono Dev List'; Monowall Support List
Subject: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
Jim Thompson wrote:
> I'd answer, but ... that would be commercial, and this is a
> non-commercial list.
This is EXACTLY the type of "commercial" information that is appropriate
to the list. You are not pushing your product, but providing on topic
information. I fine line, but a significant one. As someone else with
a commercial interest, I am not at all bothered by this post.
> You may wish to take a serious look at how much of m0n0wall you're going
> to be able to squeeze into that 4MB flash on the WP54, and how well
> FreeBSD is going to run in 16MB of memory. Oh sure, you can put more
> dram on the board, but it won't cost $75 then.
This is now a deal breaker. I had not looked at the hardware at all
when I expressed my interest. The amount of stripping to make it fit
would make m0n0wall unacceptable. The amount of money to upgrade it to
16mb flash and 128mb ram would make it no longer cost effective.
What I use as a currently available benchmark is a VIA based system.
System board $115
http://www.directron.com/epia800.html
Memory 128mb $16
Additional NIC $5 (Duel or quad port possible)
Small Case $65
http://www.directron.com/2699r.html
IDE Flash Drive $18
http://ec.transcendusa.com/product/ItemDetail.asp?ItemID=TS32MDOM40V
Total $219
This system is small rock solid, very well performing, and readily
available with no notice. The only failure I have had was someone who
put a potted plant on top and over watered it. (Seriously...) To try
something new, it would have to offer substantial advantages over this.
That said, most of my systems are off-lease small form factor Dell
systems. I pay between $50-$75 for the system, and add a nic. In this
case, a smaller option for more money would be an advantage.
Disclaimer. Directron is not my company. I am a customer. I have no
financial interest in any company above.
Lee
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m0n0wall-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
RE: Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
>>linksys NSLU2 $90 (http://www.electronicsoutfitter.com/store/92992/
>>nslu2.html or amazon)
>>or D-Link DSM-G600 ($134 on Amazon)
You have to kill me to force me to use Dlink in industrial settings. From my
experience consumer electronics from dlink usually dies within 1-3 years in
industrial setups. Out 100 devices we bought from dlink we have 7 lefts that
still kind of working. + Adding external USB network card and an not having
ability to add good radio.... looks like broken DIY project.
As to Freecom, I like that toy, but commercially wise I have no idea what is
the point to use it? Its expansive, and it works fine (I hope) without
monowall. It could be used for freeNAS but it alredy has its features so ...
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
RE: Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
The list has very little activity anyway, I have little personal interest
other than the possibility that this can further progress the usefulness of
m0n0. My vote is to allow the commercial talk because I'm curious about how
one might manufacture and market such a device. :)
--Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex M [mailto:radiussupport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:00 AM
To: 'Jim Thompson'; 'Mono Dev List'
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
Valemont, is not the manufacturer of the board. Are you talking to lunny at
VNC? Or actual manufacturer? Lunny buys at the agent said in "thousands" and
his suppliers can sale the board retail for 72$
Why you considering bord as not good idea? Also I think we can get a bit
commercial here, since its for the good of community after all.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Thompson [mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:01 AM
To: Alex M
Cc: 'Mono Dev List'; Monowall Support List
Subject: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
On Mar 5, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Alex M wrote:
> Good got one person on my side :-)
> I actually want this type of pricing for the project:
>
> 75 - Board
> 10- Power supply
> 15 - Enclosure
> Total: 100$ USD (could be less is retailers would go w/ lower margin)
>
> At than same time I want to negotiate w/ manufacturer so retailers
> would buy
> form them bulk at $50 per unit sale for 75 => margin 25 or 33%
> (Netgate and
> Ituner what do you think? [Sorry for no names :-P you should know me
> though])I will have to speak to you though so we would agree that
> you buy
> enough so manufacturer will give us that discount
I'd answer, but ... that would be commercial, and this is a non-
commercial list.
OK, the straight answer: we were already talking to them. (which is
why I pointed out that Valemont is not a great source for the board.0
> Next, why I also want to have mono-AP project is because AP/Bridge and
> router have different purposes, but I can stick with regular mono
> conversion
> and then push the AP project.
>
> As to the part that "krt" wrote... I don't really care about
> collective
> bargaining on Mini-PCI cards especially low level such as Intel-BG
> 2200 they
> too weak for enterprise use... go with 400-800mW cards.
800mW cards? Nobody makes one of those in "commercial" quantities.
(There may be some in a lab somewhere.) If you retort with
"ubiquiti" I will openly laugh. (You've been warned.)
We've just invested a lot of time (and sat on several hundred boards
while the FreeBSD developers got support in -CURRENT and
then MFC-ed into 6.2, after supplying them with a set of zero-margin
boards, so quite a bit of money) getting support for the ixp42x
Xscale going. Gateworks builds a single miniPCI board that is
approximately 'right' for a single-radio AP, so thats the current
strategy.
Until I get that shipping, I'm not going to invest much more than
'talk' in getting the WP54 running.
You may wish to take a serious look at how much of m0n0wall you're
going to be able to squeeze into that 4MB flash on the WP54, and how
well
FreeBSD is going to run in 16MB of memory. Oh sure, you can put more
dram on the board, but it won't cost $75 then.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
RE: Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
>>I think you're perhaps unprepared for the realities of what it would
>>take to put together a 10,000 unit order in order
>>to drive the pricing you've been quoted.
Actually I thought more likely to have 20,000 units. That a big # for one
supplier but if we combine many distributors we can get the quantity (yes
for you then competition will be tougher) Let's say get 20 distributors with
1000 units PO for each.
What is the time difference between NY and HI? Are you GMT -9?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Thompson [mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:57 PM
To: Alex M
Cc: 'Mono Dev List'
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall-dev] Re: [m0n0wall] Support for hardware project
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Alex M wrote:
> Valemont, is not the manufacturer of the board.
I'm sure I pointed that out.
> Are you talking to lunny at VNC?
No.
> Or actual manufacturer?
Yes.
> Lunny buys at the agent said in "thousands" and his suppliers can
> sale the board retail for 72$
>
> Why you considering bord as not good idea? Also I think we can get
> a bit
> commercial here, since its for the good of community after all.
I think the board represents a high degree of difficulty for a
FreeBSD port.
Its one thing to have a solution that is slightly too expensive
(versus 'wishes'), its quite another
to have no solution because its taking a long time to get FreeBSD
running. (a pre-requisite for
m0n0wall running, I might add.)
I think the board is somewhat under-powered for FreeBSD. The 175MHz
clockspeed might be OK,
but the CPU can't address more than 4MB of flash without jumping
through hoops (implementing segmentation).
I think you're perhaps unprepared for the realities of what it would
take to put together a 10,000 unit order in order
to drive the pricing you've been quoted.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|