On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:35:03AM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I'm strongly attempted to agree with you guys.... blacklisting looks like
> the way to go.
>
> I'm concerned about the names, tho.... BLIST_MS_SKIP_PAGE_08 sounds more
> general than it is -- as I understand it, this flag will only affect sd.c,
> tho it looks much more general.
We can change the name.
> I think I'd rather tweak the structure in slave_configure, where it will be
> easier to add more logic if people decide we need it in the future.
Unlike scsi_devinfo/dev_flags, we can't override slave_configure changes
(unless you add other code).
-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
