On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Pat LaVarre wrote:
Do you have a tar ball or such of all the code? Or is this still very much
a work in progress?
I don't see all the functions in the patch, for example, gcs_in.
I was going to say put the functions in a library, but maybe you already
are headed that way. Then create a libsgio or such, and users like
sg_utils, scsi_id, cdrecord, scsidev, etc. could link with sgio.
And lose the macros I, Y, etc, just use the function name, or at least
have more meaningful macro names.
The command line plscsi could support both long and short names (-i or
--gcs-in).
-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
