On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 05:58:27PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:53:26PM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > Doug,
> > I assume from your message that you are removing the call from
> > scsi_unjam_host to do request sense (which is good).
> >
> > Does this imply that your reworking all of the eh handling in
> > scsi_error.c?
>
> Yeah, I had some stuff I want to do there. However, I'm currently working
> on other things right now. I was saving this for later :-/
>
> > I was doing some rework in this area, but it sounds like it might
> > be counter to your work.
>
> Go ahead. I'm not into that section yet.
Doug -
I'm also doing some scsi changes - scsi_scan.c cleanup, and
multi-path IO support.
Are you doing work that affects scsi_scan.c?
Do you have a tree or such that we can sync up with?
Any moderate changes to scsi will likely affect the multi-path changes.
-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
