How safe am I to assume that SCSI LLDD will return
autosense for a failed/incomplete command, as per
SCSI core (mid-layer) error handling requrement?
(e.g. ide-scsi doesn't return autosense)
In drafts I'm more and more seeing
``targets MUST support and enable autosense.''
If indeed we put a ``MUST'' requirement on SCSI LLDD
to support and enable autosense, which will indeed
streamline things, then this will save me a an _irq_
spin lock over a simple spin lock...
What is the future of this requrement?
--
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|