|
Re: Frogs and Pigeons: msg#00005science.mathematics.frogs
Lutz, > Now it is very easy to exhibit a polynomial size proof for the > pidgeon-hole principle in the cut-free version of "SKS with substitution". Would that proof involve (other than substitution) only analytical rules, or would it also have to use some non-analytical rules such as upward aw? Giorgi |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Thesis Fellowship in Computer Science: 00005, Francois Lamarche |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Frogs and Pigeons: 00005, Lutz Strassburger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Frogs and Pigeonsi: 00005, Lutz Strassburger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Frogs and Pigeons: 00005, Lutz Strassburger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |