logo       

Re: Red and blue (again): msg#00025

science.mathematics.frogs

Subject: Re: Red and blue (again)


Wouldn't even dream of trying.



On 28 Jul 2005, at 21:23, Alessio Guglielmi wrote:

At 21:06 +0100 28/7/05, David J. Pym wrote:
I certainly agree with you that mathematical/conceptual/application naturality is what matters, and I'm not missing anything here because I didn't even try to argue about that.

What? That's *exactly* what I *did* say! Go figure.

(Aaargh, English!) I meant: mathematical/conceptual/application naturality matters and I won't argue about that. (Just for the sake of precision.)

However, order matters a lot.

Not even slightly.

A lot. (You have no chance in being more childish than me, give up.)

-Alessio


--
Prof. David J. Pym Telephone: +44 (0)1 225 38 3246
Professor of Logic & Computation Facsimile: +44 (0)1 225 38 3493
University of Bath Email:
d.j.pym-+E0FUbDlCk21Qrn1Bg8BZw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bath BA2 7AY, England, U.K. Web: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~cssdjp

Royal Society Industry Fellow, HP Labs, Bristol:
david.pym-VXdhtT5mjnY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise