|
Re: Back to computability logic: msg#00003science.mathematics.frogs
Hi Alessio and everybody. I do not check my mail very often in these summer days, either. And I could not make it to Lisbon, unfortunately. Thank you for your comments. . Question: how does cut elimination for CL5 look like? . Of course, one has to design a cut rule, but I guess . the obvious degeneration of your and-introduction would . do fine. Yes, it'd be interesting to look into this. At this point all I know (semantically) is that the system is closed under the standard version of cut ;-) A few typos (one perhaps misleading) have been corrected in the paper. The new version is at the same URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/math.LO/0506553 Ciao, Giorgi |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | New paper announcement: 00003, Yves Guiraud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Red and blue (again): 00003, Alessio Guglielmi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re:Back to computability logici: 00003, Alessio Guglielmi |
| Next by Thread: | New paper announcement: 00003, Yves Guiraud |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |