|
Pomset vs BV: msg#00019science.mathematics.frogs
Hi all, In Christian Retore's paper on Pomset Logic, he shows (via coherence semantics) that there is only one self-dual noncommutative binary operator which can be added to MLL. Since BV gives such an operator, can't one just conclude that it captures the Pomset operator? That is, do we *really* need to consider the proof nets for Pomset (of which there are two flavours - the one in Retore's original paper, and the one based on "directed cographs"). Thinking about chords in ae-circuits makes my head spin :) Jon |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: A cut-free CoS system for S5: 00019, Alessio Guglielmi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pomset vs BV: 00019, Alwen Tiu |
| Previous by Thread: | Paper announcementi: 00019, Ozan Kahramanogullari |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pomset vs BV: 00019, Alwen Tiu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |