logo       

Re:A cut-free CoS system for S5: msg#00005

science.mathematics.frogs

Subject: Re:A cut-free CoS system for S5

At 21:42 +0200 2/6/05, Phiniki Stouppa wrote:
attached is a paper (draft) I've written lately on the technical
results of my master thesis (completed last October in Dresden,
supervised by Charles Stewart). It is entitled "a system of deep
inference for the modal logic S5" and presents a cut-admissible system
for S5 in the calculus of structures. A short elaboration on the
importance and consequences of deep inference in modal systems is
given in the introduction.

I am planning to apply the final corrections/changes and submit it for
publication by the end of next week. Comments/suggestions/corrections
are more than welcome.

Hello,

I'm sending you several comments privately. I have one issue which could be suitable for discussion on the list.

The question is: Are the display calculus or hypersequents deep inference formalisms? Should we consider them so?

As far as I know, people in these areas never considered themselves as doing deep inference. Am I right? I think the term `deep inference' has been invented by Kai, actually. If so, I'm not sure we should tag the display calculus or hypersequents with deep inference, at least in context where there isn't a thorough discussion.

I see the reasons for the modal logicians: there is a clear indication that, in order to do proof theory for modal logic, there is a need of *some form* of deep inference. This is clear.

However, the notion of deep inference we have, which is `inference at any depth in formulae', is not obviously translatable into the display calculus or hypersequents. My suggestions is to continue arguing that these formalisms are `deeper' than the sequent calculus, that `some form' of deep inference is necessary for doing proof theory of certain logics, but to stop at this point, and keep the idea of deep inference in its pure form of inference at any depth. The reason is that the definition we have is simple and clear, while using it for other formalisms makes it vague.

Ciao,

-Alessio




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise