logo       

Re: Bureaucracy and identity: msg#00004

science.mathematics.frogs

Subject: Re: Bureaucracy and identity

Hello,

At 16:45 +0200 13.4.05, Lutz Strassburger wrote:
Since we had recently this interesting dicussion on bureaucracy and identity of proofs on this list, I'd like to announce the paper "From Deep Inference to Proof Nets" which I wrote more or less at the same time when the discussion was going on. It can be found here:

http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~lutz/papers/deepnet.ps

Maybe the first sentence in the introduction is a bit too strong (but thank you!).

In order to capture Formalism B, we would need Alessio's "pipes".

"My" pipes are not different (I think) from Kai's and Stephane's ones. I guess the idea comes from a discussion Stephane and I had in Paris at Michel's workshop, and I'm sure Kai worked on that independently, too.

I just wanted to say that I don't consider pipes "my" idea. They do come out naturally from the idea of allowing inference rules on derivations, but their technical realisation and understanding requires work, and I don't want this work to be attributed to myself only.

I didn't read the paper, yet, but I'll do it as soon as I can.

Ciao,

-Alessio




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise