|
Re: Calculus of structures and sequent calculus: msg#00013science.mathematics.frogs
> What is your idea of `bit'? I remember we've been > fairly lost for many months in trying to do cut > elimination in CoS, the reason being the loss of > the root connective information that the sequent > calculus has. Yes. What I meant is that *once you know what to do*, you have to struggle just a bit in order to make cut elimination work for predicate logic in CoS. For propositional logic, which you probably have in mind, there is no struggle at all, in fact it's much easier than in the sequent calculus -- again, once you know what to do. -Kai |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Calculus of structures and sequent calculus: 00013, Yves Guiraud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Calculus of structures and sequent calculus: 00013, Kai Brünnler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Calculus of structures and sequent calculusi: 00013, Alessio Guglielmi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Calculus of structures and sequent calculus: 00013, Yves Guiraud |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |