|
Re:Splitting and cut elimination: msg#00006science.mathematics.frogs
\begin{speculation} The problems with the induction rules are caused by their second-order nature. That is, locality, substitution invariance etc are all able to handle essentially first-order rules, but not second-order ones. We know for example that display logic cannot handle induction rules. Stephane Demri and I have shown that we can handle some second-order logics like Grz in display logic, but only by fiddling with the introduction rules. \end{speculation} Raj |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Splitting and cut elimination: 00006, Kai Brünnler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Splitting and cut elimination: 00006, Charles A Stewart |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Splitting, cut elimination and classical logici: 00006, Lutz Strassburger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Splitting and cut elimination: 00006, Charles A Stewart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |