|
|
September 29, 2006
- KNAW Academie Colloquium: New perspectives on Games and Interaction, martin-Q1ZVUissX3MAvxtiuMwx3w
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Peter G. Hancock
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, laureano luna
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Eray Ozkural
- Re: The Irrelevance of definite descriptions in the Slingshot Argument?, Michael Kremer
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Moshe Vardi
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, praatika-pAfYPePEUuXPzSBurWbDF/UpdFzICT1y
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, praatika-pAfYPePEUuXPzSBurWbDF/UpdFzICT1y
- Re: The Irrelevance of definite descriptions in the Slingshot Argument?, Kenny Easwaran
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Keith Brian Johnson
- Re: "Recursive", Richard Zach
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Eray Ozkural
- slingshot argument, Thomas Forster
- The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Hartley Slater
- The Irrelevance of definite descriptions in the Slingshot Argument?, Hartley Slater
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Rupert McCallum
- Re: The Irrelevance of definite descriptions in the Slingshot Argument?, Richard Heck
- Re: The Lucas-Penrose Thesis, Mark Steiner
- Re: The Irrelevance of definite descriptions in the Slingshot Argument?, Michael Zeleny
|
|