|
How to Select Administrators (use of database query): msg#00023science.linguistics.wikipedia.international
Thomasz, Jimmy, and Anthere; Thanks (again) for your comments. Now I realized more or less that admins have no special role in controversies. Certainly, deleting or freezing a controversial article without discussing about it would not be a good idea. I personally agree that admin should be serving other users, acting upon concensus of users rather than pushing his/her own personal judgements. But I am not sure how it should apply to the use of database query. It is perhaps not very powerful tool, but anyway a privilage. Is there any use of database query that is considered (serious) abuse? Say, some admins use the query to spot edits or his/her personal enemies? Well, I guess anyone can do it with "user contribution" and "recent changes." So maybe there isn't any significant danger of abuse? Also, I wonder if there is any higher expectations for admins regarding his/her behaviors in heated controversies. That is, if an admin is found to be promoting a POV (not intentionally, but, say, because of lack of efforts to understand other POVs), wouldn't it be a more serious problem than just a non-admin user doing the same? If someone has something to say about these things (or other things), I would like to listen. Tomos _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | new language link: 00023, Giskart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to Select Administrators (use of database query): 00023, Brion Vibber |
| Previous by Thread: | new language linki: 00023, Giskart |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How to Select Administrators (use of database query): 00023, Brion Vibber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |