logo       

How to Select Administrators (use of database query): msg#00023

science.linguistics.wikipedia.international

Subject: How to Select Administrators (use of database query)

Thomasz, Jimmy, and Anthere;

Thanks (again) for your comments.

Now I realized more or less that admins have no special role in controversies. Certainly, deleting or freezing a controversial article without discussing about it would not be a good idea.

I personally agree that admin should be serving other users, acting upon concensus of users rather than pushing his/her own personal judgements.

But I am not sure how it should apply to the use of database query. It is perhaps not very powerful tool, but anyway a privilage. Is there any use of database query that is considered (serious) abuse? Say, some admins use the query to spot edits or his/her personal enemies? Well, I guess anyone can do it with "user contribution" and "recent changes." So maybe there isn't any significant danger of abuse?

Also, I wonder if there is any higher expectations for admins regarding his/her behaviors in heated controversies. That is, if an admin is found to be promoting a POV (not intentionally, but, say, because of lack of efforts to understand other POVs), wouldn't it be a more serious problem than just a non-admin user doing the same?

If someone has something to say about these things (or other things), I would like to listen.

Tomos

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise