|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: Identity games by Florentin Smarandache - msg#00325List: science.linguistics.wikipedia.englishWhat I know is this: Smarandache has a history of inventing multiple personalities. I have three confirmed fake names, invented by him. The three personalities are Carol Harlestle, Charles T. Le and George Gregory. FS = 64.106.24.52 (static line at Gallup) http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Neutrosophy&diff=996825&oldid=989864 CTL = 64.106.24.52 http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion&diff=989777&oldid=989735 CTL=CH http://groups.google.com/groups?q=carol+smarandache&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&selm=8rglbo%2413q%241%40nnrp1.deja.com&rnum=2 GG = 64.106.24.52 http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:gzDvOQpAK30J:www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Comments/comments.html+%2264.106.24.52%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 (google cache of http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Comments/comments.html) Additionally, AxelBoldt has made a case that FS is Dr. Minh Perez, on [[Florentin Smarandache]]. The user accounts which have been created in the past few days and have been used to support Smarandache include johnkamla, Lit-sci, Bigtexas, Arizonaval. I don't know if that's all of them. There have also been suspicious anonymous edits under the Gallup IP addresses 64.106.24.51 and 64.106.24.53 -- could be different computers in the same lab. If my theory turns out to be correct, I suggest we threaten FS with banning. Identity games like this should not be allowed. -- Tim Starling. _________________________________________________________________ Get mobile Hotmail. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message previewWe're number two, we're number two! (was filtering)At 03:30 AM 6/8/2003, you wrote: (Anybody that hasn't searched Google for "felching" is advised to do so. The results page is informative in several ways!) -- Toby Wikipedia's article on felching is the #2 Google hit when you search for felching! I've added [[Felching]] to [[Wikipedia:Top 10 Google hits, A-K]]. Think we can hit #1 with a little work? I've never been so proud.... ----- Dante Alighieri dalighieri-KgRVb285F3YM+ivGRdBiH9vLeJWuRmrY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis." -Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321 Next Message by Date: click to view message previewRequest for help with new articleHowdy all, I just wrote a new article, [[List of ethnic slurs]]. I've put a redirect at [[List of racial epithets]]. Now, the list also includes terms for people based on their religion, but I don't think that the article title is that big a deal. Now, on to my request. Because I've from the United States, the list is obviously heavily populated with American English examples. I'm hoping that people from other countries (especially non-English speaking ones) will stop by to add in their own terms. Just to clarify, I'm interested in this as a scholarly pursuit, although it will probably be used for unsavory purposes by unsavory individuals. If you could all take the time to go look and make whatever changes you think will improve the article, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks in advance! http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs ----- Dante Alighieri dalighieri-KgRVb285F3YM+ivGRdBiH9vLeJWuRmrY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis." -Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321 Previous Message by Thread: click to view message previewRe: WikiEN-l digest, Vol 1 #431 - 16 msgsKQ writes: >> I'm not being a wag; I'm being serious when I say that >> if Bill Clinton (and other articles) fit into one >> category only, then we're recreating subpages. Stevertigo writes: >I think this is all off the point. We all in good >faith understand what reasonable people could be >objecting to - namely articles like teabagging, >buttplugs, creampies, the list goes on... Is it really so unclear what I'm saying? The idea of what is "sexually explicit" has at various times included piano legs, women's ankles, and Elvis Presley's hips. In quite a few places on the planet, it still includes women's ankles, and I'm sure it would include Elvis Presley's hips as well. For an example in the opposite direction, Robert Mapplethorpe considered his work "erotic," yet many (many) people consider it "pornographic." Should I point you to the obscenity trials for James Joyce's _Ulysses_? Anyway, tagging articles with commentary of that sort--"sexually explicit," etc.--is the same as imposing your cultural POV onto them; in other words, it is the same as declaring the wikipedia a developed nation's middle-class anglocentric-pedia. Exactly how is that of benefit to us? kq __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com Next Message by Thread: click to view message previewRe: Identity games by Florentin Smarandache--- Tim Starling <ts4294967296-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What I know is this: Smarandache has a history of inventing multiple > personalities. I have three confirmed fake names, invented by him. > The three > personalities are Carol Harlestle, Charles T. Le and George Gregory. Wonderful detective work! Charles T. Le actually managed to get an article which praises Smarandache into a peer reviewed math journal, and in addition he generates about 130 Google hits, every last one of them about Smarandache. No institutional affiliation discernable. Gregory shows up as an editor of some of Smarandache's publications. This will make for a great addition to [[Florentin Smarandache]] :-) Axel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com Loading Comments...
|
|
